tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1640217576313519402.post4534484517079783385..comments2023-06-15T10:44:04.241+01:00Comments on Claws and Fists: Art and 40k, the musings of a tired mind!Claws and Fistshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01520310240629884669noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1640217576313519402.post-15931416212768748532011-05-13T21:15:12.772+01:002011-05-13T21:15:12.772+01:00I have always seen it as the player makes the list...I have always seen it as the player makes the list, not the list makes the player.<br /><br />Having a good list is in part of being a good player, but how many net lists do you see in mid or bottom table obscurity in tournaments?<br /><br />You make the list for yourself, like how artists paint for themselves.John Hollandnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1640217576313519402.post-55711115713951554022011-05-13T20:17:13.369+01:002011-05-13T20:17:13.369+01:00I have to agree. There's the accepted norm whe...I have to agree. There's the accepted norm when it comes to lists and anything outside that box that doesn't include a novel long explanation is seen as crap. I'm not saying the list writer shouldn't include some explanation but at the same time so many people are quick to judge.Thorhttp://creativetwilight.com/noreply@blogger.com